Buganda Kingdom Development Strategy

BACKGROUND Information

Introduction

Socio-Economic National Profile
Socio-Economic Conditions in Buganda

Causes of the Ills affecting Buganda

Existing Development Initiatives in Buganda

The Rationale

1.1 Introduction

Even after a century since the Europeans explored what they called the Dark Continent, Africa remains the least developed continent with the majority of its people living in abominable conditions, without sustainable democratic institutions that can tackle its numerous political and social scourges. The abandonment by Africa of its traditions and political cultures on the advent of the European colonisation, and the wholesale adoption of foreign cultures vulnerable to corruption and authoritarian rule, has made the continent lag behind, despite its enormous natural and human resources. 

The concept and process of development in Buganda dates back over 700 years ago. The king (the Kabaka) as its supreme ruler and his Parliament (the Lukiiko) were the key institutions playing a crucial role in the development of the kingdom and its people. The history of Buganda’s development over the past years can be summarized in three phases.

The first phase (pre-1900) was the pre-colonial, during which courageous Kings expanded and consolidated the kingdom’s territory, supported ancestral economies and inventions, and fostered civilisation. Most values cherished in contemporary Buganda anchors in this period. Through centuries of its existence, Buganda was a region of plenty in resources, rapid growth, blossoming prosperity and culture of dignity. 

This condition was attributed primarily to four factors:

(i)An excellent climate and arable soils, which ensured sufficient production of food and cash crops, and a wide range of vegetables and fruits;

(ii)A well organized and respected monarchy, which was the foundation and fountain of development and civilization;

(iii)A society with virtues of hard work and achievement-orientedness; and

(iv)Social cohesion along the family and clan ties, which served as a basis for voluntary communal work, entrepreneurship development, and ethical conduct. 

Unfortunately, most of these virtues gradually faded during the subsequent periods.

The second phase (1900-1962) was the colonial period, with the colonial agents placing administration policy above development. This period, in many cases, thwarted the indigenous innovations previously achieved.

The third phase, which is the post-colonial period, particularly between 1966-1986, saw not only the dethronement of the king and his monarchy, but also disruption of the social and economic order and activities, at the regional and national levels. The twenty years of political turmoil threw Buganda into wilderness. The abolition of the monarchy and the inability of existing central governments to harness regional diversity as a basis for sustainable development resulted into the collapse of the cultural and traditional institutions that erstwhile conditioned work ethics. The ultimate effect was, among others, collapse of the formal economy, decline in agricultural production and quality of living conditions, and the environmental degradation.

The fourth phase, the period after 1993 witnessed the restoration of the monarchy, continued implementation of prudent macro-economic policy reforms by the government, which enabled the country to start registering economic and social progress. 

1.2 Socio-economic National Profile

Uganda’s population was projected at 20.9 million in year 2000, of which 51% were female and 49% are male. The growth rate is estimated at 2.5% and a fertility rate of 6.9, (Uganda demographic and Health Survey, 1995). In particular, Buganda region carries a total population of about 5.5 million. 

Over the thirteen years from 1986-1999, Uganda has attained an impressive economic growth. This is mainly due to the economic reforms intended to correct macro-economic imbalances, structural adjustment policies for addressing distortions in the market operation. (Uganda Poverty Assessment Report, 1999). 

Uganda’s Gross Domestic Product has grown at the average rate of 6.0 percent per annum over the last thirteen years, and the inflation rate maintained below 10%. The Gross Domestic (GDP) per capita has grown at a rate of 3.4% per annum, and the per capita income currently is estimated at US$ 300. 

Nevertheless, Uganda remains one of the poorest countries in Sub-Saharan Africa and within the camp of the Third World countries. According to the Uganda Poverty Assessment Report, (1999), while the proportion of Ugandans affected by absolute poverty had declined, by 1997 44 percent of the population were unable to meet their basic requirements. The regional disparity of poverty depicted the central as having registered a drastic decline in poverty compared to the rest of Uganda. Nevertheless, the poverty line may not capture the important indicators of human development, namely education levels, health conditions, civic participation in local and national decision making process. 

Uganda as a country still scores low regarding the Human Development Indicators. 

(i)The overall life expectance in Uganda has declined from 52 years in 1985 to 42 years in 1997, mainly due to the effects of AIDS. 

(ii)Regarding accessibility to health facilities, only 49 percent f the population lives within five kilometre of the health services country wide, and 42% parishes have any type of health facility, (Health Sector Strategic Plan 2000). 

(iii)The percentage of stunted children below 4 years was 38 percent in 1995.

(iv)The rural population with access to safe water was only 45 percent in 1995.

(v)The adult literacy rate was 65 percent in 1995, (Uganda Poverty Assessment Report, 1999). 

1.3 Socio-economic Conditions in Buganda Kingdom 

As already noted above, the official statistics depicts the central as having registered a drastic decline in poverty compared to the rest of Uganda. Nevertheless, the problem of poverty in rural areas of the central region may be bigger than the official statistics may have depicted it. The problem is that the official statistics tend to include Kampala district in the overall aggregate. This also explains why few Non-governmental Organizations operate within Buganda region. The reality is that majority of rural people in Buganda Kingdom is unable to earn a descent income and meeting the basic necessities of life. The Buganda Kingdom region is affected by those poor socio-economic conditions as much as they affect the rest of Ugandans. According to recent studies, the real life conditions affecting majority of people within Buganda Kingdom region are:

(i)Lack of a decent accommodation, 

(ii)Inability to meet basic necessities of life, low levels of agricultural production, 

(iii)Low prices for the produce,

(iv)High level of moral degradation,

(v)Undesirable rural to urban migration,

(vi)High level of dejectedness especially among the impoverished,

(vii)High levels of unemployment, especially in the urban areas, 

(viii)High incidence of preventable diseases and infirmity, malnutrition among infants and adults alike,

(ix)Unsafe water and poor sanitation conditions,

(x)Poor community road conditions, 

(xi)Relatively high level illiteracy and lack of functional skills,

(xii)Inequitable access to sources of livelihood by the women, children, youth, disabled,

(xiii)High prevalence of orphanage problem,

(xiv)Dishonest and poor work ethics, and 

(xv)Environmental degradation.

The communities that are severely affected by these problems are those found in the rural and isolated and marginal areas of Buganda region; and the vulnerable groups, for instance; the youth, women, disabled, the children, unemployed, orphans, the old and sick, street children, fishermen and the urban unemployed.

1.4 Causes of the ills affecting Buganda 

The available information indicates that that the causes of the conditions mentioned above are many, ranging from deficiencies in individual character to structural constraints. Some of the specific primary causes of the current deplorable social and economic conditions within Buganda Kingdom region are:

(i)Absence of effective coercive developmental mobilization and guidance effort

(ii)Lack of training in modern farming methods and techniques,

(iii)Limited access to farm inputs and High Yielding Varieties, 

(iv)Limited access to investment capital,

(v)Lack of co-operation at the family and community level in the area of production, marketing, saving, entrepreneurial development,

(vi)Undeveloped off-farm income earning opportunities,

(vii)Limited access to entrepreneurial skills,

(viii)Uneven distribution of health and education services, 

(ix)Limited access to knowledge and tools for sustainable natural resources management (land and energy inclusive),

(x)Diminished cultural values as instruments for developing and maintaining community roads, water and sanitation, education and community facilities, 

(xi)People’s inability to use the family, community, clan as institutions for cultural and economic development, 

(xii)Lack of an effective strategy for mobilizing and sensitizing the general public on their rights and obligations in social, economic and political processes,

(xiii)Lack of community exemplar ole-models,

(xiv)De-emphasis of religious education in schools

(xv)Broken family units

(xvi)Withdrawal syndrome and defeatism

(xvii)Inadequate and/or improper socialization process at family, peer group and education levels, and

(xviii)Laziness and present-time orientedness. 

 

1.5 Existing Development Initiatives in Buganda 

In the aftermath of the four years’ restoration of the Buganda Kingdom, one of the greatest challenges has been to tackle those problems within the limited resources envelope. The kingdom still suffers from limited access to financial, human, physical, managerial, information and communication resources and infrastructure. 

The strategic choice has been to complement the government effort in poverty reduction process. These development initiatives have been undertaken through the existing Buganda Kingdom Ministries, and these are the Ministries of:

(i)Planning and Economic Development

(ii)Finance

(iii)Agriculture, Animal Industry, Fisheries and Environment

(iv)Industry, Commerce, Tourism and Heritage

(v)Education and Sports

(vi)Health

(vii)Rehabilitation

(viii)Water and Energy

(ix)Works, Women Affairs and Community Development

(x)Cabinet and Youth Affairs

In addition, the kingdom has managed to set up administrative structures at the County, Sub-county, Parish and village levels, intended to mobilize the communities for cultural and development programmes.

At the economic front, the Kingdom established BUCADEF as a non-governmental agency for service delivery, and also put in place Buganda Investment and Commercial Undertaking Ltd (BICUL), a holding company charged with setting up commercial ventures, with the intent of reducing poverty through employment opportunities. The Central Broadcasting Services Ltd is a brainchild of BICUL.

1.6 The Rationale

In spite of the progress so far registered at the macro level, majority of Ugandans, and in particular, the people within Buganda Kingdom still live in unacceptable conditions. In fact, enormous task remains unaccomplished. The first challenge facing the government is translating the macro-based gains into sustainable benefits at community, household and individual levels. The second onus relates to inducing regional development through harnessing regional diversities and opportunities within the overall national policy framework. The third challenge is exploiting the nexus of resources and opportunities offered by the private sector and civil society. Such hurdles explain the persistence of poverty at the grass root, albeit the economic growth so far attained in Uganda.
Suffice it to note that, the current implementation decentralisation policy is an attempt to overcome such inefficiencies. Nevertheless, the existing poverty programmes at the district level still need to be complemented in an innovative way. In this respect, the traditional and cultural institutions certainly have a great potential and role to play. 

Return to: Top of this page | BKDS Main Page | Window on Mmengo | Buganda Home |